The cancellation of 26 of the planned 29 Seawolf-class submarines in 1992 created a fundamental dilemma for the U.S. Navy. The Cold War was over, but the submarine force still needed to replace 62 aging Los Angeles-class boats over the coming decades. Submarines like USS Albuquerque (SSN-706) were extraordinarily capable — but they had been designed in an era before microprocessors, before photonics, before modular construction, and before the post-Cold War threat environment that now included littoral combat, special operations, counter-terrorism, and intelligence collection in coastal waters worldwide.
The Seawolf was unaffordable at volume. The Los Angeles class was aging out. A new design was needed — one that could be built at a rate of at least two per year, at a cost the Congress and the Navy could sustain, while delivering the core capabilities needed for the 21st century. In 1998, the program that would become the Virginia class received its first Congressional authorization.
One revolutionary aspect of the Virginia class program was immediately apparent: for the first time in U.S. submarine history, two shipyards would share production. General Dynamics Electric Boat in Groton, Connecticut — builder of every previous nuclear submarine in this analysis — would co-produce each boat with Huntington Ingalls Industries/Newport News Shipbuilding in Newport News, Virginia. Each yard builds half of every boat, then one yard assembles and delivers. This industrial innovation distributes risk, maintains two centers of submarine expertise, and provides production flexibility that a single-yard program cannot.
The design philosophy was deliberately different from both the Los Angeles and Seawolf classes. Rather than optimizing for a single threat — the Soviet submarine force in the North Atlantic, as the Los Angeles class was — Virginia was designed to excel across the full spectrum of 21st-century submarine missions:
Virginia Class Mission Profile
Anti-submarine warfare (ASW) in both open-ocean and littoral environments; anti-surface warfare (ASuW); intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR); mine warfare operations; special operations forces (SOF) support; and land attack via Tomahawk cruise missiles. No single previous class could perform all of these missions with equal competence. Virginia was designed from the keel up to do so.
Several technology leaps distinguished Virginia from every previous class. No optical periscopes: for the first time on a U.S. submarine, the Virginia class uses retractable photonics masts — fiber-optic camera systems with electronic image processing — instead of traditional optical periscopes that penetrate the pressure hull. This eliminates a major hull penetration, allows the mast to be used at higher speeds and greater depths than a periscope, and enables image data to be distributed throughout the boat on digital displays. Fly-by-wire ship control: digital control surfaces replaced the hydraulic and mechanical systems of prior classes. Modular construction: the hull sections are designed for future upgrades, as demonstrated by the Block III bow redesign and the Block V Virginia Payload Module insert. Life-of-ship reactor (S9G): unlike the Los Angeles class — which required a multi-year, multi-hundred-million-dollar nuclear refueling overhaul at mid-life — the S9G reactor in Virginia does not need refueling for the life of the submarine, dramatically reducing total ownership cost.
The lead boat, USS Virginia (SSN-774), was commissioned October 23, 2004 at Groton, Connecticut.